The science of the twentieth century based on rationalism, positivism arrived at the dawn of the 3rd millennium to its limits. A new cosmological paradigm generating a new framework for scientific thinking is needed to continue to be able to explain complex phenomena around us.

IBOSDSOO universal substrate, similar to the concept of “String” is both simpler and more powerful in its ability to describe physical and mathematical developments. Angular axes OAWOO, near by the concept of vector dimensions, also allow a clearer view of the phenomena across the cosmos.

This new perspective of the cosmos is also extended, one hand by infinite universal dimensions, and by the 10 major dimensions described by Oomomen in particular, which give us the vision of a space, where travel and communications in multi-cosmos are intelligible.

This IBOSDSOO model fits perfectly consistent and in line with the developed or approached theses for millennia in many terrestrial crops, Vedic Maya, the Leibniz “monads”, through Fourier and Niels Bohr “quantum interconnection” and in 1952 the “quantum potential field” of the holographic model of David Bohm. This long intellectual journey found one of his decisive evidence in 1982, with Alain Aspect and his team, what is now called “quantum entanglement” and which is non-local.

The switching of angular axes can be complete to move to another part or three-dimensional framework for LEIYO effects of “anti-gravity”. Black holes do not really exist; it is simply great mass neutron stars that end their lives into anticosmos.

The anticosmos contains large amounts of anti-matter that affect our current cosmos. We see these masses by its gravitational effects and changes in the rate of expansion of the cosmos that contemporary science understands in terms of “black” matter and energy.

All anticosmos cosmos and are separated by a membrane XOODII that contains masses without volume that carry the gravitational effects from a cosmos into its opposite.

Tetravalent logic allows new mathematical developments and consistent homogeneous transcendental understanding of cosmological entities hitherto relegated to the domain of metaphysics.

The being OEMMIIWOA often referred to as a prophet finds its place in a logic of human evolution. It is physically a mutant human whom directly will capture stream of communication from Meta brain BUAWE BIAEI. Meta-brain is a relay entity of that we call “God”, it can try to guide human evolution path towards more intellectual and spiritual.

There is no religious vision in this new paradigm, and I condemn in advance any person attempting to hijack this work in a religious or sectarian purpose.

Instead, this new cosmological vision reconciles Science and Theology in a new unified paradigm of rational-positivist approach including Metaphysics.

Life emergence What marks the difference between the inert and the living is that the inert material is subjected to physico-chemical laws, while for Living the physico-chemical hazard is controlled and “directed” by models into the planetary-BB. When crossing the threshold of the “krypton constant” inert pass under the control of the planetary-BB and architecture of alive structures go up. The archaic-BAAYIODUU is consisted and allows the assembly of amino acids archaic-RNA that is replicated by physico-chemical mechanisms and quickly encapsulated in membranes.The first living entities archaic-RNA based are under the influence phylogeny and orthogenic laws which are implemented according to genotypic and phenotypic patterns contained in the planetary-BB which controls mutations. The laws of evolution expressed by BAAYIODIXAA concept follow a more rapid evolution than would be the only statistical random, quantum laws governing microphysical phenomena. Thus, Darwin’s finches had mutated through viable genotypic and phenotypic patterns, much faster than if the changes were due to chance alone. Darwinian natural selection does the rest…

table of Contents

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1

THE COSMOBIOPHYSICS 3 THIRDS THEORY 3
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3

The COSMOBIOPHYSICS 3 Thirds Theory 5
A NEW COSMOLOGICAL PARADIGM 7
The Multi-Cosmos Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
The Simplified Cosmological Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
The General Cosmological Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
The transcendent cosmological entities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
WOA, “GOD” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
AAIODI, the “Absolute Reality”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
the potentiality of creating the absolute reality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Other Cosmological Entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
WAAM-UU, the Cosmic Meta Brain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
The Planetary Brain BUUAWE BIAEEI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
The Aura and OEMBUAW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
The inter-cosmic communication layer XOODII WAAM . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
WAAM-U, the cosmos of the “Souls”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
BUAWA, the “Soul” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Synthetic Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
A transcendent being: OEMMIIWOA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
The Cosmo-Physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36
the universal substratum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
WAVES AND IBOSDSOO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
THE UNIVERSAL DIMENSIONS OAWOO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Semantic analysis of OAWOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
DIMENSIONAL TOPOLOGY OF A COSMOS WAAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
The OAWOO and the GAUGE GROUPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
THE MULTI-BIG-BANG OF THE WAAM-WAAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
The Big Bang of our cosmos and the OAWOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
The birth of Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
The birth of Space or of “Spatiality” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
The masses and imaginary masses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
The “dark matter” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
The “dark” energy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
The switching of angular axes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
The switching axes staying in our cosmos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
The switching axes with cosmos change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
The switching axis to go into the anti-cosmos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
The case of black holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Tetravalent logic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63
The first value of tetravalence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
The word AIOOYAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
The field of Cosmology/Physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
The second value of tetravalence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
The word AÏOOYEEDOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
The cosmo-physical and primary concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
The third value of the tetravalence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
The word AIOOYAU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
The field of Cosmology/Physics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
The fourth value of tetravalence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
The word AMMIE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
The cosmo-physical and primary concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Excerpts of Cosmobiophysics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
Spatio-temporal Man. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Summary and Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76

THE LIFE EMERGENCE 79
The context of a meta-brain planetary-BB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79
The hypothesis of “Krypton constant” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80
Detail of the hypothesis of “Krypton constant” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82
General information on nonlinear dynamic systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
nonlinear dynamic systems for the “krypton constant” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
The LEIYO effect and krypton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Summary and Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

THE ORIENTED EVOLUTION OF LIFE 89
Phylogeny and orthogenic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90
The Emergence of organic protomolecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF THE TERM UUDIE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Summary of evolution phases: RNA, proteins, DNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Conclusion on the Life emergence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95

INFORMATION FLOWS OF ALIVE SPECIES 97
Information flows of alive species. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
The identification of the emitting specie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
The identification of the planet transmitter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
The flow of information entering into BB. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
The flow of information coming out of BB. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Hypothesis on BB categorization structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Human brain flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
The bio-frequencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Effectors of GeSi2C3H3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Frequencies of amino acids and proteins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109ix
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

THE GENESIS OF “SOUL” BUAWA 113
Hypothesis on the flow of information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Soul and Time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Prove the existence of the soul buawa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
The concept and the limits of “reincarnation” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
BB’s impregnation errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Integration of the soul to the planetary meta-brain . . . . . . . . . . . .122

THE INFLUENCE OF CELESTIAL BODIES ON THE MIND
127
State of the Art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
The context of the assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Electromagnetic hypothesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
Gravitational hypothesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
The first structuration factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Second structuration factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
The structuring phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
The dynamic phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

TELEPATHIC COMMUNICATION 135
Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Description of telepathy flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Message encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
The effectors of GESI2C3H3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
Oommo telepathy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
The remote viewing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
Remote care. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144

COMMUNICATION WITH “SPIRITS” 147
Pre-cognition or vision of the future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
The transcommunication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
Hear “voice” of beyond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
The electronic identification markers of «voices» . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
interpretation within the cosmological framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
Hypothesis of analysis of a sound communication on Earth (TCI) . . . . 159
Mass projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Holographic projections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
The Global Consciousness Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
The chronovisor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
“Haunted” places. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
Space-time trail and aura . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
Incidents of integration of Soul-BUAWA to the planetary-BB . . . . . . . . . . . 173
The residual aura . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
BB link with the residual aura . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
The antenna effect with the XOODII cosmos layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
The ghost’s life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
Presentation of a case of residual aura. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
Interpretation of the case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
Orbs and animal projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
The “possessions”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
the poltergeist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
Exocivilisation’s residual aura in Easter Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
Wavelengths of “ghosts”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
Scalar bio-frequencies?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
The “ghost” in minerals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
The orbs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
Crop circle and “ghosts” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
Near dead experience—nde. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
The residual aura-memorial cyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192

MENTAL HANDLING AND ABDUCTIONS 195
God and Exocivilizations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
The abductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
Mental manipulation and memorials flashing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
The “memorial flashing” of knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
The “memorial flashing” of ability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
The “memorial flashing” of ability and knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
Out of body experiment (obe) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .203

EMERGENCE AND EVOLUTION OF MAN 205
The emergence of homo habilis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .205
Could the anunna possibly be aliens?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .208
Have the anunna created man on earth? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .209
The anunnaki and nibiru . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
The anunnaki and the pleiades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
The Anunnaki and reptilians . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
New hypotheses about the sumerian mythology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Ashiwi native americans and the aliens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Conclusion on the influence of exocivilizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .220
Possible future developments of man . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .220

GENERAL CONCLUSION 225

BIBLIOGRAPHY 228